Alternatives · Compared · 2026

PayID against every other deposit method, set out the way a payments analyst would set it out

PayTo, POLi, debit, prepaid, crypto and plain bank transfer each work differently and carry a different legal status for online wagering. This page compares them on speed, cost and permitted status, with the 2024 credit and crypto ban placed in context.

  • 18+
  • Independent
  • No operators promoted
Diagram comparing PayID against PayTo, debit cards, prepaid vouchers and banned payment methods
01

Why the comparison matters more than the deposit itself

Every method on this page moves money between bank accounts or cards; none of them changes whether the site receiving the payment is licensed in Australia. The comparison that follows is about mechanics and permitted status only: how fast a method settles, what it costs, and whether Australian law currently allows it for online wagering. It says nothing about the legal status of any operator accepting these methods, which is covered separately on the is PayID pokies legal page.

Two of the six methods below are now banned outright for wagering, one has been discontinued entirely, and the rest remain permitted with different trade-offs. Treating all of them as interchangeable "just a way to pay" is the most common mistake this page exists to correct.

What "permitted" means in this context

A method being permitted means Australian law does not currently prohibit its use for a wagering transaction. It does not mean the receiving site is licensed, supervised, or safe. Those are separate questions addressed on other pages of this site.

02

PayID, briefly recapped

PayID lets a payer send money to an identifier, a mobile number, email address, or ABN, instead of a BSB and account number. The receiving bank shows the registered payee name before the sender confirms, and transfers typically settle in under a minute over the NPP, 24 hours a day. Official technical detail on registration and how the identifier resolves sits on PayID's own how-it-works page. The step-by-step deposit flow, including a worked timing example, is covered in full on the PayID deposits page.

The property that matters for every comparison below

PayID moves money you already hold in your account, not borrowed funds and not a decentralised asset. That single property is what keeps it on the permitted side of the 2023 Amendment Act, and it is the same property shared by PayTo, debit cards, and plain bank transfers, which is why those four sit together on one side of this comparison.

03

PayID vs PayTo

PayTo is a newer NPP service built around pre-authorised agreements rather than one-off transfers. A payer approves an arrangement once, inside their own banking app, and the receiver can then initiate payments against that agreement within limits the payer set, similar in spirit to a direct debit but settling in real time rather than over days. Adoption has grown slowly since its introduction, and it remains far less common at online pokies sites than PayID, largely because setting up a standing agreement is a heavier onboarding step than a one-off PayID transfer for a payer who may only use a given site occasionally.

For a player, the practical difference is consent style: PayID requires you to actively initiate every transfer, while a PayTo agreement, once approved, allows the receiver to pull agreed amounts without you re-authorising each one. That distinction is worth understanding before approving any PayTo agreement with an unfamiliar payment processor.

04

PayID vs POLi (closed 2022)

POLi worked by briefly connecting to a customer's own online banking session to confirm a transfer on the merchant's behalf, a mechanism increasingly out of step with bank security standards that moved away from third-party session access. Its operator closed the service in 2022, and it has not been revived under a different name. Any site still displaying POLi as a live deposit option is showing an outdated checkout page; the method itself cannot process a transfer today.

Why this matters beyond one dead payment option

A payment menu still listing a service that has been closed for several years is a signal about how carefully an operator maintains its own site, independent of anything about legality. It is a small but genuine data point worth noticing when comparing offshore sites to each other.

05

PayID vs debit cards

Debit cards remain a permitted deposit method for online wagering because they draw on funds already held in an account rather than extending credit. This is the structural reason debit survived the 2023 Amendment Act while credit cards did not: the ban specifically targets credit and digital currency, and the legislation draws that line explicitly rather than banning cards as a category.

Compared with PayID, a debit card deposit is typically instant at checkout with no separate app step, but it also means handing a card number to an offshore processor, something PayID avoids entirely since the transfer is account-to-account and no card details are shared with the site.

06

PayID vs prepaid cards and vouchers

General-purpose prepaid gift cards are usually restricted by their issuer to specific merchant categories and are commonly blocked at gambling merchants outright, which limits their practical use for pokies deposits. A smaller category of prepaid payment vouchers, designed for online purchases broadly rather than gambling specifically, sometimes works at offshore sites, but these carry no gambling-specific consumer protection and no Australian regulatory oversight of the voucher issuer in most cases.

Against PayID, prepaid methods trade the speed and no-card-details advantage of PayID for a layer of anonymity some players prefer, since a voucher purchased in cash is not directly tied to a bank account in the same way a PayID transfer is.

07

PayID vs digital currency

Digital currency, cryptocurrency in practice, has been banned as a payment method for online wagering in Australia since 11 June 2024 under the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Credit and Other Measures) Act 2023, the same legislation that banned credit cards, with penalties for providers of up to AU$234,750 per breach. Before the ban, crypto's appeal for some players was reduced traceability compared with a bank-linked transfer; that trade-off is now moot for wagering specifically, since the method is prohibited regardless of which exchange or wallet is used.

PayID sits on the opposite side of this line entirely. It moves existing bank funds rather than a decentralised asset, which is the exact distinction the ban is built around, and it remains fully permitted for wagering as a result.

08

PayID vs a plain bank transfer

A plain bank transfer using a BSB and account number still works everywhere PayID does, but it is slower in practice, often minutes rather than seconds, and can take until the next business day outside real-time payment hours at some institutions, and it requires the payer to correctly enter both the BSB and account number rather than a single identifier. The name-check step PayID provides before you confirm has no direct equivalent with a plain BSB transfer at most banks, which makes a misdirected payment somewhat easier with a traditional transfer.

Why PayID has largely replaced plain transfers for this use case

Where both are offered, PayID is faster to set up on a returning visit, since the identifier is registered once and reused, and it provides one additional fraud check a plain transfer typically does not. Plain bank transfer remains relevant mainly for processors that have not implemented PayID acceptance, or for a payer who has not registered a PayID at all.

Reality check: none of these six methods says anything about whether the receiving site is licensed. A permitted payment method and a lawful gambling service are two separate questions, covered separately on this site.
09

Full comparison table

MethodSpeedStatus for wageringProsCons
PayIDUnder 60 secondsPermittedFast, free at most banks, payee name shown before confirming, no card details sharedDeposit only reflects PayID's own limits and processor matching delays
PayToReal-timePermittedNo re-authorisation needed once an agreement is approvedHeavier setup step; low adoption at pokies sites so far
POLiN/ADiscontinuedNone; service closedCannot be used at all since 2022
Debit cardInstantPermittedFamiliar checkout flow, no separate app stepCard number shared with an offshore processor
Prepaid voucherVariesPermitted (limited acceptance)Some distance from a linked bank accountFrequently blocked by issuer at gambling merchants; no gambling-specific protection
Digital currencyMinutesBanned since 11 Jun 2024None applicable for wageringProhibited under the 2023 Amendment Act; penalties apply to providers
Plain bank transferMinutes to next business dayPermittedWorks with any bank, no registration neededSlower; requires BSB and account number; weaker name-check protection
10

A worked example: choosing between two live options

Take a player deciding between a $180 PayID deposit and the same amount by plain bank transfer at a site offering both. Using PayID, they open their banking app, enter the identifier the site displays along with a reference code, confirm the registered payee name matches, and the transfer settles in roughly 20 to 45 seconds; the site then matches the payment to their account within a further few seconds to two minutes using the reference code.

Using a plain bank transfer for the identical $180, the player instead enters a BSB and account number manually, with no payee name shown to check beforehand at most banks, and the transfer can take anywhere from a few minutes to the next business day to clear, depending on the receiving bank's processing window and whether it falls outside real-time payment hours. In this example, choosing PayID over the plain transfer saves anywhere from several minutes to the better part of a day, with the added benefit of a name check the plain transfer does not offer.

11

Fees across methods, briefly

Australian banks generally do not charge customers to send a PayID transfer, a PayTo payment, or a plain bank transfer; any fee that appears on a deposit usually comes from the receiving processor rather than the bank, and this holds across all three account-based methods. Debit card deposits can occasionally attract a processing surcharge set by the payment gateway, commonly a small flat fee or a percentage in the low single digits, disclosed at checkout rather than by the bank. Prepaid vouchers frequently carry a purchase fee at the point the voucher itself is bought, separate from anything charged at the deposit stage.

Why none of these fee structures are regulated in this context

Because the receiving processor typically sits offshore, no Australian regulator caps what it can charge on a withdrawal or deposit, regardless of which of these methods delivered the funds. Reading a site's own published fee schedule before depositing remains the only real protection, since the payment method chosen does not change that exposure.

12

Where this fits with the rest of this site

This page compares payment mechanics only. How a PayID deposit actually flows step by step, with its own worked example, is on the PayID deposits page, and withdrawal timing sits on the fast withdrawals page. Whether any of this matters legally is a separate question, covered in full on the is PayID pokies legal page, and the safety controls that apply regardless of payment method are on the safe and responsible play page.

The one distinction worth carrying forward

A payment method being fast, free, or permitted tells you nothing about the site accepting it. Keep that separation in mind when reading marketing that leans on payment convenience as if it were a mark of legitimacy.

Key takeaways

  • PayID, PayTo, debit cards and plain bank transfers remain permitted for online wagering because they move existing funds, not credit or crypto.
  • Credit cards and digital currency have both been banned for wagering since 11 June 2024, with penalties up to AU$234,750 for providers.
  • POLi closed in 2022 and cannot process a transfer today, whatever a checkout page still displays.
  • PayTo uses pre-authorised agreements rather than one-off transfers, and adoption at pokies sites remains low so far.
  • None of these payment methods, permitted or banned, says anything about whether the receiving site holds an Australian licence.

How we researched this

This page draws on PayID's and PayTo's own published technical documentation from Australian Payments Plus and NPP Australia, public reporting on POLi's 2022 closure, and the text of the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Credit and Other Measures) Act 2023, checked in July 2026.

OG
By Olivia Grant
Reviewed by Michael Byrne, former ACMA compliance officer · Updated 23 July 2026

Frequently asked questions

Is PayTo simply a newer version of PayID?

No, they solve different problems. PayID is an identifier used for one-off, sender-initiated transfers. PayTo is a pre-authorised agreement model, closer to a direct debit, where a receiver can pull agreed payments once the payer has approved the arrangement. Both run on the NPP, but they are separate services with different consent mechanics.

Why did POLi shut down instead of being upgraded?

POLi worked by temporarily accessing a customer's online banking session to confirm a transfer, an approach banks increasingly restricted on security grounds as screen-scraping methods fell out of favour industry-wide. Rather than rebuild the service on a different technical model, its operator closed it in 2022.

If a site still lists POLi as a deposit option, what does that mean?

It means the site's payment page is out of date. POLi closed in 2022 and cannot process a transfer regardless of what a checkout menu displays. An operator still listing it as live is not maintaining its payment integrations carefully, which is worth noticing beyond the payment question itself.

Can a prepaid gift card be used the same way a prepaid gambling voucher might be?

Generally no. Most general-purpose prepaid gift cards are restricted to specific merchant categories by the issuer and are commonly blocked at gambling merchants outright. A small number of dedicated prepaid payment vouchers exist for online purchases broadly, but they are not built around gambling and carry no special standing under Australian wagering rules.

Does using a bank transfer instead of PayID make a deposit any more traceable to a pokies site?

Not meaningfully. Both methods move money between bank accounts and both typically appear on a statement under whatever merchant descriptor the receiving processor chooses, rather than the operator's actual name. Neither method is materially more or less traceable than the other from the sender's side.

Will banks eventually block PayID for gambling the way they did with credit cards?

There is no current legislation banning PayID for wagering the way the 2023 Amendment Act banned credit cards and digital currency from 11 June 2024. PayID remains a permitted account-based method. Any future change would need its own legislative or regulatory action; nothing indicates that is imminent as of mid-2026.